Key Takeaways:
- Portfolio rationalization is a dynamic method to adjust project portfolios in line with market shifts and organizational goals.
- Regularly revisiting and revising your portfolio can help maintain alignment with strategic objectives.
- Addressing “zombie projects” clears up resources for more viable initiatives.
- Decisiveness, proactive communication, and acceptance of uncertainty are essential in portfolio management during crises.
Unveiling Portfolio Rationalization
Amid the constantly shifting business landscape, portfolio rationalization stands out as a beacon, guiding companies in their quest for growth and resilience. By evaluating their active projects against available resources and strategic goals, businesses can make more informed decisions and prioritize efforts that align with their objectives.
Understanding the Essence of Portfolio Rationalization
Portfolio rationalization involves a continual adjustment of a company’s project portfolio. This adjustment takes into account the changing dynamics of the market, economic conditions, and an organization’s strategic intentions. It requires a holistic view of current resources and ongoing projects. Post assessment, companies can prioritize or deprioritize projects based on their alignment with resource availability and strategic direction.
Ten Guiding Steps to Portfolio Rationalization
- Alignment with Resource Allocation: Portfolio decisions should be in sync with resource allocation, primarily managed at the business unit level, ensuring cohesion in strategic direction.
- Revise Innovation Strategy: Uncertain times often redefine market dynamics. Project managers must reevaluate assumptions, identify transient market shifts, and revise strategies accordingly.
- Foster Decisiveness: Adopting a decisive stance, especially when reducing project capacity, prevents repeated cuts and maintains productivity. Abandoning projects “on hold” and taking clear actions is vital.
- Eliminate Zombie Projects: Address projects that linger without substantial progress, like unapproved projects, dormant tasks, and disconnected science projects. Cleaning up such projects frees resources for more valuable endeavors.
- Reassess Project Forecasts: Adjust revenue predictions, especially for segments hit hardest by disruptions, by applying weighted risk considerations.
- Adopt Tiered Ranking: Utilize a tiered approach (‘A,’ ‘B,’ ‘C’) for project prioritization, focusing on the broader perspective rather than intricate ranking debates.
- Release Sunk Costs: Holding onto failed projects due to past investments is detrimental. Recognize when to move on, capturing lessons learned for future applications.
- Guard Bottleneck Functions: Identify and protect functions pivotal to the project pipeline, ensuring not to overlook them during rationalization.
- Protect New-Growth Projects: While core business remains essential during crises, safeguarding the future involves preserving new-growth projects. Adopting metered funding can be a way to continue essential experiments without excessive spending.
- Amplify Communication: Keep stakeholders informed about changes in innovation strategy, project priorities, and resource shifts. Encouraging feedback and collaboration during these times ensures cohesive movement towards shared goals.
The Future Awaits: Be Prepared
While the current scenario brims with volatility, it also presents an opportunity for introspection and strategic revision. Portfolio rationalization is not merely about survival but about positioning oneself advantageously for the inevitable recovery. By acting promptly and prioritizing effectively, businesses can not only weather the present storm but also be prepared to seize emerging opportunities in the post-crisis landscape.